The recent announcement made by Google that it is launching it's own operating system has created quite a media frenzy. Google Chrome as it named promises to use "Web as an OS". Not sure if I understood this marketing phrase correctly, I thought to find out exactly what is it that Google is set about doing?
After reading the details, it became quite clear to me that what google are doing is that they are "Creating a new windowing system on linux kernel". This is the only technical detail I could find of the new OS on Google blog. What constitutes an operating system is quite a debate, but I am sure purists would agree with me that "Kernel is the operating system".
So, from the details which has emerged now, Google are not creating an operating system. They are merely re-launching an existing open-source proven operating system with a new windows system (shell).
I am sure Google would make it very simple, user-friendly and easier-to-use but at the end of the day it is linux with a google shell on it. Not a new operating system as the headlines make it out to be.
PS: Some people won't agree on it and if you want you are always welcome to leave a comment and I will try to answer. My post is based on the information available today.
Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts
Friday, 10 July 2009
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
Bing
I have been playing with the new Microsoft search engine - Bing and its actually not that bad. Do try it out by visiting http://www.bing.com.
Sunday, 17 May 2009
Wolfram Alpha
After all the hype, Wolfram Aplha was launched this weekend and has already attracted tremendous media coverage. It's been touted as the future face of internet. Unlike traditional search engines, it claims to be an "answer engine" rather than a search engine. You type in the question and it come up with an answer ... nice.. isn't it. Sounds like the "Computer" in science fiction movies.
Unlike google, it's not a search engine. It's a "knowledge engine" containing trillions of data elements stored in a manner that computation is possible on them. Mathemetica, also developed by Steven Wolframe is at the heart of the engine. I did some queries on the engine like "What is the population of the world" and "center of the earth" and it came up with the numbers - very impressive
Then I remember that is a "I'm feeling lucky" button on google, which also make an "intelligent guess" on your answer. I typed in the same questions "What is the population of the world" and "center of the earth" and google took to wikipedia page about the population of world - not exactly what I asked for. Wolfram Alpha scored over google.
But then I asked a non-factual question "Who is Roger federer's wife" and wolfram alpha was stumped. Asked the same on google and it promptly came up with the page of his wife's details.
I tried another question "best place to eat in London" and wolfram alpha didn't return an answer. Asked the same to google and pressed the "I'm feeling lucky" button it came up with a list of restaurants - not exactly and answer but let me choose from a list of good restaurants. This is exactly what I wanted.
The matter of fact is that it is almost impossible to find answers of absolute everything. A lot of things have answers, which depend upon the context in which the question is asked. The question "Best restaurant in London" would have a different answer depending upon the person's own likes or dislikes. So until an engine like Wolfram Alpha has a historical perspective of every visiting person (which itself is a scary thought), it is very difficult to complete what the ultimate vision of the project is.
Also, the hype that Wolfram Alpha will replace google is not true as said by the creater himself.
Unlike google, it's not a search engine. It's a "knowledge engine" containing trillions of data elements stored in a manner that computation is possible on them. Mathemetica, also developed by Steven Wolframe is at the heart of the engine. I did some queries on the engine like "What is the population of the world" and "center of the earth" and it came up with the numbers - very impressive
Then I remember that is a "I'm feeling lucky" button on google, which also make an "intelligent guess" on your answer. I typed in the same questions "What is the population of the world" and "center of the earth" and google took to wikipedia page about the population of world - not exactly what I asked for. Wolfram Alpha scored over google.
But then I asked a non-factual question "Who is Roger federer's wife" and wolfram alpha was stumped. Asked the same on google and it promptly came up with the page of his wife's details.
I tried another question "best place to eat in London" and wolfram alpha didn't return an answer. Asked the same to google and pressed the "I'm feeling lucky" button it came up with a list of restaurants - not exactly and answer but let me choose from a list of good restaurants. This is exactly what I wanted.
The matter of fact is that it is almost impossible to find answers of absolute everything. A lot of things have answers, which depend upon the context in which the question is asked. The question "Best restaurant in London" would have a different answer depending upon the person's own likes or dislikes. So until an engine like Wolfram Alpha has a historical perspective of every visiting person (which itself is a scary thought), it is very difficult to complete what the ultimate vision of the project is.
Also, the hype that Wolfram Alpha will replace google is not true as said by the creater himself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)